Skip to main content

Q. What is meant by right to equality of opportunity In public employment? What are its exceptions?

Ans. The provisions regarding right to equal opportunity in public employment arc contained in Article 16 of the Constitution. These provisions are—
(1) Every citizen shall enjoy equality of opportunity in public employment.
(2) No citizen shall be discriminated against in the public employment under the Stale only on the grounds of religion, race, caste, place of birth, descent or residence or any of them.
(3) However, Parliament may by law provide for making residence as one of the eligibility conditions for public employment in a State.
(4) The State is empowered to make any provision for the reservation of appointments or posts in favour of any backward class of citizen which, in the opinion of’ the State, is not adequately represented in the services of the State.
(5) The Seventy-Seven (Constitution) Amendment Act, 1995. further broadens the scope of this provision. Thus, the State can make any provision for reservation is matters of promotion to any class or classes of posts in the services of the State in

favour of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes, which in the opinion of the State, are not adequately represented in the services under the State.
(6) It may he provided by law that the incumbent of an office in connection with the affairs of any religious institution or its governing body, shall be a person professing a particular religion.
It should be mentioned that the right to equal opportunity in.public services is confined to Indian citizens only. The grounds of discrimination have been explained in Article 16 itself. These exceptions called positive discrimination are made in favour of backward classes and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes.
However, it should be remembered that giving equal opportunity in public service does not mean absolute equality in strict sense The distinctions on the ground of age, qualifications etc. are to be maintained within the orbit of equal opportunity in public services. This was held by the Supreme Court in the case of Subha Chand Vs. Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking (1981).
The Supreme Court has, however; also ruled in General Manager Vs. Rangachari (1962) that the Slate is entitled to select the best persons out of the candidates who have applied for some post but the select ion criterion should not be arbitrary. The selection should he made under the determined policies and principles. The court also ruled in this case that the provisions of 16(1) arc not only applicable in case of first appointment but also in promotion, retirement, salary, leaves, increment, gratuity, pensions, etc.
Under the provisions of Article 16(4), the State can make reservation of posts in public services in favour of socially and educationally backward classes of people, if these classes are not adequately represented in the services of the State. But the criterion of reservation cannot he only caste or religion. The accepted criterion is that if more than 9O persons belonging to a caste are socially and educationally backward. the persons belonging to that caste may he included in the backward

category (Rulings of the Supreme Court in Venkatraman Vs. State (1951) and Balaji Vs. State of Mysore (1963). There arc no specific directions in the Constitution as to what should be the maximum limit of reservation in public services. The Supreme Court in the case of Dr. Chakradhar Paswan Vs. State of Bihar and others (198), held that there shall not be any reservation in making appointment to a single post. If the posts vacant re more than one, the reservation becomes applicable. The court reiterated its earlier decision in Balaji case (1963) that the reservation should not exceed fifty per cent of the total vacant posts. Even after the implementation of reservation in favour of Backward classes as recommended by the Mandal Commission, the court is of the opinion that the reservation should not exceed the limit of fifty per cent.


Popular posts from this blog



13.0 Learning Outcome

13.1 Introduction

13.2 Initiatives towards Constitutional Status to Local Governance

13.2.1 Features of 73rd Constitutional Amendment

13.2.2 Features of 74th Constitutional Amendment

13.2.3 Decentralised Planning in Context of 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendment Act

13.3 Initiatives after Economic Reforms

13.4 Functioning of PRIs in Various States after 73rd Amendment

13.5 Functioning of Local Governance after 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendment: Observations

13.6 Conclusion

13.7 Key Concepts

13.8 References and Further Reading

13.9 Activities


After studying this Unit you should be able to:

• Identify the background of revitalisation of local governance;

• Understand the features of 73rd and 74th constitutional amendment;

• Discuss the initiatives after economic reforms; and

• Outlines the functioning of local governance in various states after the amendment.


The revitalization of Pancha…

Q. What is the meaning of the terms like ‘Pardon’, ‘Reprieve’, ‘Respite’, ‘Remission’ and ‘Commutation’ with respect to the power of the President to grant pardon to convicted persons?

Ans. In terms of their scope and effect, these terms have specific connotations. The effect of Pardon is to abolish punishment and to absolve the convict of all charges. If Pardon is granted, it is assured as if the convict has not committed any crime. The convict will not face any disabilities due to the allegations and charges made against him. ‘Remission’ means reducing the punishment without changing the nature of punishment. For example, the imprisonment for 20 years may be reduced to the imprisonment for 10 years. ‘Commutation’ means reducing the punishment by changing the nature of punishment. For example, punishment to death may be changed to life imprisonment. ‘Respite’ means reducing or changing the nature of punishment in view of the specific facts and circumstances of the convict. For example, the punishment to death awarded to a pregnant woman, may be changed to simple life imprisonment. Respite means delay in execution of punishment especially that of death, in order to …



1.0 Learning outcome

1.1 Introduction

1.2 Concept of Democratic Decentralisation

1.3 Evolution of Democratic Decentralisation

1.4 Significance of Democratic Decentralisation

1.5 Democratic Decentralisation in India

1.6 Conclusion

1.7 Key concepts

1.8 References and Further Reading

1.9 Activities


After studying this unit, you should be able to:

• Understand the concept of Democratic Decentralization;

• Know the evolution and significance of Democratic Decentralization; and

• Describe the Democratic Decentralization pattern in India.


The dawn of 21st century is marked by decentralized governance both as a strategy and philosophy of brining about reforms and changes in democracies. These changes led to such virtues of transparency, responsiveness and accountability and ensures good governance. Today decentralization and democracy are the most significant themes in the development discourse. In the present contex…