Skip to main content

Q. What are the constitutional provisions with respect to protection during the custody of persons under general laws?

Q. What are the constitutional provisions with respect to protection during the custody of persons under general laws?
Ans. The Sections (1) and (2) of Article 22 provide the following protection to persons in custody under the general process of law—
(1) The person in custody should be informed, as soon as possible about the grounds of taking such persons in custody.
(2) Such person has the right to seek legal remedies and o consult the legal practitioner of his choice.
(3) Every person who is arrested and detained in custody shall be produced before the nearest Magistrate within a period of 24 hours of such arrest.
(4) Every person who is detained beyond 24 hours without being prod uced to the nearest court has the right to be freed from such custody.
In Madhya Pradesh Vs.
Shobharam case (1966), the Supreme Court decided that the right to know the grounds of arrest continues even after the person is released on bail after such arrest. In Tarpad Vs. State of West Bengal case (1951), the court ruled that if there is delay in informing the arrested person the grounds of such arrest, there must be reasonable cause for such delay.
In terms of the rulings of the Supreme Court in Hussain Arra Khatton Vs. State of Bihar, if a person is unable to bear the expenses of hiring a legal practitioner, such person has the right to avail free legal aid. And if the free legal aid is not made available o such person, it would be considered as violation of Article 21. However, a formal request is necessary by such person to avail free legal aid.
It should be mentioned that the time taken in journey in producing a detained person before the nearest court is not counted in the prescribed period of 24 hours. If the arrested person is released on bail within the period of 24 hours, there is no binding to produce such a person before the nearest court within a period of 24 hours of his arrest.
The following two categories of persons are not entitled to get the protections during detention, which are available under Article 21(1) and (2).
(1) Persons arrested or detained under preventive detention measures.
(2) A person who for the time being is an enemy alien.


Popular posts from this blog



13.0 Learning Outcome

13.1 Introduction

13.2 Initiatives towards Constitutional Status to Local Governance

13.2.1 Features of 73rd Constitutional Amendment

13.2.2 Features of 74th Constitutional Amendment

13.2.3 Decentralised Planning in Context of 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendment Act

13.3 Initiatives after Economic Reforms

13.4 Functioning of PRIs in Various States after 73rd Amendment

13.5 Functioning of Local Governance after 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendment: Observations

13.6 Conclusion

13.7 Key Concepts

13.8 References and Further Reading

13.9 Activities


After studying this Unit you should be able to:

• Identify the background of revitalisation of local governance;

• Understand the features of 73rd and 74th constitutional amendment;

• Discuss the initiatives after economic reforms; and

• Outlines the functioning of local governance in various states after the amendment.


The revitalization of Pancha…

Q. What is the meaning of the terms like ‘Pardon’, ‘Reprieve’, ‘Respite’, ‘Remission’ and ‘Commutation’ with respect to the power of the President to grant pardon to convicted persons?

Ans. In terms of their scope and effect, these terms have specific connotations. The effect of Pardon is to abolish punishment and to absolve the convict of all charges. If Pardon is granted, it is assured as if the convict has not committed any crime. The convict will not face any disabilities due to the allegations and charges made against him. ‘Remission’ means reducing the punishment without changing the nature of punishment. For example, the imprisonment for 20 years may be reduced to the imprisonment for 10 years. ‘Commutation’ means reducing the punishment by changing the nature of punishment. For example, punishment to death may be changed to life imprisonment. ‘Respite’ means reducing or changing the nature of punishment in view of the specific facts and circumstances of the convict. For example, the punishment to death awarded to a pregnant woman, may be changed to simple life imprisonment. Respite means delay in execution of punishment especially that of death, in order to …



1.0 Learning outcome

1.1 Introduction

1.2 Concept of Democratic Decentralisation

1.3 Evolution of Democratic Decentralisation

1.4 Significance of Democratic Decentralisation

1.5 Democratic Decentralisation in India

1.6 Conclusion

1.7 Key concepts

1.8 References and Further Reading

1.9 Activities


After studying this unit, you should be able to:

• Understand the concept of Democratic Decentralization;

• Know the evolution and significance of Democratic Decentralization; and

• Describe the Democratic Decentralization pattern in India.


The dawn of 21st century is marked by decentralized governance both as a strategy and philosophy of brining about reforms and changes in democracies. These changes led to such virtues of transparency, responsiveness and accountability and ensures good governance. Today decentralization and democracy are the most significant themes in the development discourse. In the present contex…